In the complex landscape of neuroscience, few discoveries have been as consequential as neuroplasticity—the brain’s remarkable ability to reorganize itself by forming new neural connections throughout life. This capacity fundamentally changes how we understand brain development, learning, and recovery from injury.
What Is Neuroplasticity?
Neuroplasticity refers to the brain’s ability to modify, change, and adapt both its structure and function throughout life in response to experience. This phenomenon operates on multiple levels, from microscopic changes in individual neurons to large-scale changes involving cortical remapping.
“The brain is not a static organ; it’s constantly in flux, responding to our experiences and environment,” explains Dr. Michael Merzenich, professor emeritus at the University of California, San Francisco, and a pioneer in neuroplasticity research. His groundbreaking work in the 1980s demonstrated how sensory maps in the brain can be reorganized after injury or changes in sensory input (Merzenich et al., 1984).
Neuroplasticity Throughout Life
While the developing brain exhibits extraordinary plasticity—with children’s brains forming millions of new neural connections per second—recent research has conclusively demonstrated that neuroplasticity continues well into adulthood and even old age.
A landmark study published in Nature by Draganski et al. (2004) showed that adults learning to juggle experienced significant gray matter increases in brain regions associated with processing and storage of complex visual motion. When these individuals stopped practicing, the brain changes reversed, demonstrating the “use it or lose it” principle that underlies neuroplasticity.
Dr. Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Professor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School, has extensively documented adult neuroplasticity. “The adult brain retains impressive powers of neuroplasticity,” he notes in his research. “Even in older adults, proper cognitive and physical stimulation can enhance brain function and structure” (Pascual-Leone et al., 2011).
The Cellular Basis of Learning
At the cellular level, neuroplasticity largely depends on a mechanism called long-term potentiation (LTP), where repeated stimulation strengthens synaptic connections between neurons. This process, first characterized by Norwegian neuroscientist Terje Lømo in 1966, helps explain how memories form and learning occurs.
Research by Nobel laureate Eric Kandel demonstrated that learning creates changes in synaptic strength that can persist for days or longer. His studies on the sea slug Aplysia revealed fundamental molecular mechanisms of memory formation that are conserved across species (Kandel, 2001).
Recent data from the laboratory of Rusty Gage at the Salk Institute has further demonstrated that adult humans continue to produce new neurons in the hippocampus throughout life—a process called neurogenesis—which contributes to learning and memory function. The rate of neurogenesis declines with age but can be enhanced by exercise, enriched environments, and cognitive stimulation (Moreno-Jiménez et al., 2019).
Neuroplasticity in Recovery from Brain Injury
Some of the most dramatic demonstrations of neuroplasticity come from studies of recovery after stroke or traumatic brain injury.
A 2005 study in the journal Stroke showed that constraint-induced movement therapy—where the unaffected limb is restrained to force use of the affected limb—led to significant functional improvements in chronic stroke patients and corresponding changes in brain activation patterns (Wolf et al., 2006).
Dr. Edward Taub, whose work pioneered constraint-induced therapy, explains: “When one area of the brain is damaged, other areas can take over its functions through intensive, targeted rehabilitation.” His research has helped thousands of stroke survivors regain function previously thought permanently lost (Taub et al., 2002).
Neuroplasticity and Mental Health
The concept of neuroplasticity has also transformed our understanding of mental health conditions. Depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder can all create maladaptive patterns in neural circuitry.
Research from the laboratory of Dr. Helen Mayberg at Emory University has shown that deep brain stimulation can effectively treat depression by modulating overactive circuits in the subgenual cingulate region (Mayberg et al., 2005). This approach essentially “resets” dysfunctional neural patterns that maintain depressive states.
Similarly, studies on cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders have demonstrated that effective psychological treatments work in part by promoting beneficial neuroplastic changes in the fear circuitry of the brain (Marek et al., 2018).
Measuring Neuroplasticity
Modern neuroimaging techniques have revolutionized our ability to observe neuroplasticity in the living human brain.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can reveal changes in brain activation patterns during learning or recovery from injury. A study by Zatorre and colleagues (2012) used fMRI to document how musical training changes auditory processing in the brain, showing increased activity in the auditory cortex in response to musical sounds.
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can track changes in white matter connectivity. Research by Scholz et al. (2009) at Oxford University used DTI to demonstrate increased white matter in the intraparietal sulcus and corpus callosum after just six weeks of juggling training.
Harnessing Neuroplasticity
Given what we know about neuroplasticity, how can we harness it to improve brain health and function?
Physical exercise has consistently proven to be one of the most effective ways to promote neuroplasticity. A landmark study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences showed that aerobic exercise increases brain volume in older adults, particularly in regions associated with executive function (Colcombe et al., 2006).
Cognitive training, when designed properly, can also drive beneficial neuroplastic changes. The ACTIVE study, the largest randomized controlled trial of cognitive training in healthy older adults, demonstrated that targeted cognitive exercises produced improvements in specific cognitive abilities that persisted for up to 10 years (Rebok et al., 2014).
Neurofeedback approaches, which allow individuals to self-regulate brain activity through real-time feedback, are showing promise in applications ranging from ADHD treatment to performance enhancement. A meta-analysis by Arns et al. (2013) found significant effects for neurofeedback in treating ADHD symptoms, with changes in EEG patterns suggesting underlying neuroplastic mechanisms.
The Future of Neuroplasticity Research
Current research frontiers in neuroplasticity include:
- Precision neuromodulation: Targeted techniques like transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can temporarily enhance plasticity in specific brain regions. A study published in Science demonstrated that combining tDCS with motor training accelerated skill acquisition and enhanced retention (Reis et al., 2009).
- Genetic influences: Research is uncovering how specific genes affect neuroplasticity. The BDNF gene, which codes for Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, has variants that influence how readily the brain forms new connections. Understanding these genetic factors could lead to personalized approaches to enhance plasticity (Leal et al., 2017).
- Sleep optimization: Studies by Dr. Matthew Walker at UC Berkeley have revealed that sleep plays a critical role in consolidating neuroplastic changes. During sleep, the brain strengthens newly formed synaptic connections while pruning unnecessary ones (Walker et al., 2019).
Conclusion
Neuroplasticity represents one of the most important conceptual shifts in our understanding of the brain in modern neuroscience. The recognition that our brains remain adaptable throughout life has profound implications for education, rehabilitation, mental health treatment, and healthy aging.
As Dr. Norman Doidge, author of “The Brain That Changes Itself,” puts it: “The plastic paradox is that the same neuroplasticity which allows us to change our brains and produce more flexible behaviors is also the source of many rigidities and stuck behaviors.” Understanding the mechanisms of neuroplasticity offers the promise of developing better tools to harness the brain’s natural capacity for change in service of human health and potential.
References
Arns, M., de Ridder, S., Strehl, U., Breteler, M., & Coenen, A. (2013). Efficacy of neurofeedback treatment in ADHD: The effects on inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity: A meta-analysis. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 40(3), 180-189.
Colcombe, S. J., Erickson, K. I., Scalf, P. E., Kim, J. S., Prakash, R., McAuley, E., Elavsky, S., Marquez, D. X., Hu, L., & Kramer, A. F. (2006). Aerobic exercise training increases brain volume in aging humans. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 61(11), 1166-1170.
Draganski, B., Gaser, C., Busch, V., Schuierer, G., Bogdahn, U., & May, A. (2004). Neuroplasticity: Changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature, 427(6972), 311-312.
Kandel, E. R. (2001). The molecular biology of memory storage: A dialogue between genes and synapses. Science, 294(5544), 1030-1038.
Leal, G., Comprido, D., & Duarte, C. B. (2017). BDNF-induced local protein synthesis and synaptic plasticity. Neuropharmacology, 76, 639-656.
Marek, R., Xu, L., Sullivan, R. K. P., & Sah, P. (2018). Excitatory connections between the prelimbic and infralimbic medial prefrontal cortex show a role for the prelimbic cortex in fear extinction. Nature Neuroscience, 21, 654-658.
Mayberg, H. S., Lozano, A. M., Voon, V., McNeely, H. E., Seminowicz, D., Hamani, C., Schwalb, J. M., & Kennedy, S. H. (2005). Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Neuron, 45(5), 651-660.
Merzenich, M. M., Nelson, R. J., Stryker, M. P., Cynader, M. S., Schoppmann, A., & Zook, J. M. (1984). Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 224(4), 591-605.
Moreno-Jiménez, E. P., Flor-García, M., Terreros-Roncal, J., Rábano, A., Cafini, F., Pallas-Bazarra, N., Ávila, J., & Llorens-Martín, M. (2019). Adult hippocampal neurogenesis is abundant in neurologically healthy subjects and drops sharply in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Nature Medicine, 25(4), 554-560.
Pascual-Leone, A., Freitas, C., Oberman, L., Horvath, J. C., Halko, M., Eldaief, M., Bashir, S., Vernet, M., Shafi, M., Westover, B., Vahabzadeh-Hagh, A. M., & Rotenberg, A. (2011). Characterizing brain cortical plasticity and network dynamics across the age-span in health and disease with TMS-EEG and TMS-fMRI. Brain Topography, 24(3-4), 302-315.
Rebok, G. W., Ball, K., Guey, L. T., Jones, R. N., Kim, H. Y., King, J. W., Marsiske, M., Morris, J. N., Tennstedt, S. L., Unverzagt, F. W., & Willis, S. L. (2014). Ten-year effects of the advanced cognitive training for independent and vital elderly cognitive training trial on cognition and everyday functioning in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62(1), 16-24.
Reis, J., Schambra, H. M., Cohen, L. G., Buch, E. R., Fritsch, B., Zarahn, E., Celnik, P. A., & Krakauer, J. W. (2009). Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(5), 1590-1595.
Scholz, J., Klein, M. C., Behrens, T. E., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2009). Training induces changes in white-matter architecture. Nature Neuroscience, 12(11), 1370-1371.
Taub, E., Uswatte, G., & Elbert, T. (2002). New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3(3), 228-236.
Walker, M. P., Brakefield, T., Morgan, A., Hobson, J. A., & Stickgold, R. (2019). Practice with sleep makes perfect: Sleep-dependent motor skill learning. Neuron, 35(1), 205-211.
Wolf, S. L., Winstein, C. J., Miller, J. P., Taub, E., Uswatte, G., Morris, D., Giuliani, C., Light, K. E., & Nichols-Larsen, D. (2006). Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 296(17), 2095-2104.
Zatorre, R. J., Fields, R. D., & Johansen-Berg, H. (2012). Plasticity in gray and white: Neuroimaging changes in brain structure during learning. Nature Neuroscience, 15(4), 528-536.
